.jpg)
Friday, March 28, 2014
Concluding observations of the second periodic report of Nepal*
संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघीय मानव अधिकाकर समतिले आफ्नो सिफारिश तथा निश्कर्षहरु चैत १२ गते प्रकाशित गरेको छ, जसमा समितिले तराई क्षेत्रमा भएको गैरकानूनी हत्या, हिरासतमा भएको मृत्यु तथा हिरासतमा दिनेगरिएको यातना तथा हिरासतमा गर्नेगरिएको अमर्यादित व्यवहारका सम्बन्धमा चिन्ता व्यक्त गरेको छ । समितिले कानून कार्यान्वयन गर्ने अधिकारीहरुद्वारा हुने अत्यधिक शक्तिको प्रयोग रोक्नका लागि व्यवहारिक कदम चाल्नका लागि पनि सुझाव दिएको छ । उच्च सतरीय आयोग वनाई यस्ता आरोपहरुलाई छानवीन गर्न संसद व्यवस्थापीकामा रहेका सभासदहरुले यो बिषयमा आवाज उठाउन जरुरी छ ।
| ||||||
.ADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION |
Concluding observations of the second
periodic report of Nepal*
1. The
Committee considered the second periodic report submitted by Nepal
(CCPR/C/NPL/2) at its 3050th and 3051st meetings (CCPR/C/SR.3050 and
CCPR/C/SR.3051), held on 18 and 19 March 2014. At its 3061st meeting
(CCPR/C/SR.3061), held on 26 March 2014, it adopted the following concluding
observations.
A. Introduction
2. The
Committee welcomes the submission of the second periodic report of Nepal, which
was due in 1997, and the information presented therein. It expresses
appreciation for the opportunity to engage in a constructive dialogue with the
State party’s delegation on the measures that the State party has taken since
its last review in 1994 to implement the provisions of the Covenant. The
Committee is grateful to the State party for its written replies
(CCPR/C/NPL/Q/2/Add.1) to the list of issues, which were supplemented by the
oral responses provided by the delegation.
B. Positive aspects
3. The
Committee welcomes the following legislative and institutional steps taken by
the State party:
(a) The signing of the Comprehensive
Peace Accord in 2006;
(b) The adoption of the interim
Constitution in 2007;
(c) The introduction of a third gender in
various official documents, including citizenship certificates, pursuant to the
Supreme Court judgment of 21 December 2007; and
(d) The
establishment of the second Constituent Assembly in January 2014 and the
appointment of the Cabinet in February 2014.
4. The
Committee welcomes the ratification by the State party of the following
international instruments:
(a) The Second Optional Protocol to the
Covenant in 1998;
(b) The Optional Protocol to the
Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed
conflict in 2006;
(c) The Optional Protocol to the
Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child
prostitution and child pornography in 2007;
(d) The Optional Protocol to the
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women in
2007;
(e) The United Nations Convention against
Transnational Organized Crime in 2006 and the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and
Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the
Convention, in 2008; and
(f) The Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol in 2010.
C. Principal matters of concern and
recommendations
Impunity
for gross violations committed during the conflict
5. The
Committee is concerned at the prevailing culture of impunity for gross
violations of international human rights law and serious violations of
international humanitarian law committed during the ten-year conflict from 1996
to 2006, including extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, torture,
sexual violence and arbitrary detention. In particular, it expresses concern
at:
(a) The lack of investigation and
prosecution of perpetrators, exacerbated by political interference in the
criminal justice system, such as the refusal by the police to register First
Information Reports, pressure exerted on law enforcement officials not to
investigate or prosecute certain cases, and extensive withdrawal of charges
against persons accused of human rights violations; noting that not a single conflict
related case has been successfully prosecuted through the criminal justice
system;
(b) The denial of effective remedies to
victims, noting that only limited monetary forms of assistance have been
provided to some victims or their relatives under the Interim Relief Programme
while others have been excluded, including victims of torture, rape and other
forms of sexual violence; and
(c) The lack of a vetting system to
exclude persons accused of serious human rights violations from holding public
office and the practice of promoting such individuals instead (arts. 2, 3, 6,
7, 9, 10 and 16).
The
State party should:
(a) Ensure
that all gross violations of international human rights law, including torture
and enforced disappearances, are explicitly prohibited as criminal offences
under domestic law;
(b) End
all forms of political interference in the criminal justice system and
undertake independent and thorough investigations into alleged conflict-related
cases of human rights violations, and hold the perpetrators accountable without
any further delay. The Committee stresses that transitional justice mechanisms
cannot serve to dispense with the criminal prosecution of serious human rights
violations;
(c) Create,
as a matter of priority and without further delay, a transitional justice
mechanism in accordance with the Supreme Court writ of mandamus of 2 January 2014 and ensure its
effective and independent functioning in accordance with international law and
standards, including by prohibiting amnesties for gross violations of
international human rights law and serious violations of international
humanitarian law;
(d) Ensure
that all victims are provided with an effective remedy, including appropriate
compensation, restitution and rehabilitation, taking into account the Basic
Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims
of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of
International Humanitarian Law (A/RES/60/147); and
(e) Adopt
guidelines for vetting to prevent those accused of violations of the Covenant
from holding public office and being promoted.
Views
under the Optional Protocol to the Covenant
6. While
welcoming the commitment expressed by the State party delegation to fully
implement the Views of the Committee adopted under the first Optional Protocol,
and noting that “interim relief” has been provided to some victims, the
Committee expresses concern at the failure of the State party to implement the
Views of the
Committee (art. 2).
Committee (art. 2).
The Committee urges the State party to take
concrete steps to give full effect to all Views on individual communications
adopted by the Committee, in particular by conducting prompt, thorough and
independent investigations, prosecuting those responsible, and providing
effective remedies and reparation to victims without any further delay. The
Committee reiterates that transitional justice mechanisms are not sufficient to
dispense with the criminal prosecution of serious human rights violations.
National
Human Rights Commission (NHRC)
7. The
Committee is concerned at the introduction of restrictions to the independent
and effective functioning of the NHRC through the adoption of the National Human
Rights Act in 2012. While noting the Supreme Court decision of 6 March 2013
which declared various provisions of the Act null and void, the Committee
regrets the lack of progress in bringing the Act in line with the Paris
Principles. It also regrets the inadequate implementation of the
recommendations issued by the NHRC, despite the fact that they are binding
under domestic law (art. 2).
The
State party should amend the National Human Rights Act 2068 (2012) to bring it
in line with the Paris Principles (General Assembly resolution 48/134, annex)
and the Supreme Court decision of 6 March 2013 so as to ensure its independent
and effective functioning. It should also amend procedures governing the
appointment of Commissioners to ensure a fair, inclusive and transparent
selection process, and ensure that the recommendations issued by the NHRC are
effectively implemented.
Gender
equality
8. While
noting the steps taken by the State party to promote gender equality, the
Committee expresses concern at the extremely low representation of women,
particularly Dalit and indigenous women, in high-level decision-making
positions. The Committee regrets the persistence of patriarchal attitudes and
deep-rooted stereotypes that perpetrate discrimination against women in all
spheres of life, and the prevalence of harmful traditional practices such as
child marriage, the dowry system, son preference, witchcraft accusations and chaupadi (arts. 2, 3 and 26).
The
State party should take all necessary measures to effectively implement and
enforce the existing legal and policy frameworks on gender equality and
non-discrimination, pursue its efforts to increase the representation of women
in decision-making positions, and develop concrete strategies to eliminate
gender stereotypes on the role of women, including through public awareness
campaigns. It should also take appropriate measures to: (a) explicitly prohibit
all forms of harmful traditional practices in domestic law and ensure their
effective implementation in practice; (b) conduct awareness-raising campaigns
on the prohibition and negative effects of such practices, particularly in
rural areas; and (c) encourage reporting of such offences, investigate
complaints from victims and bring those responsible to justice.
Caste-based
discrimination
9. While
welcoming the adoption of the Caste-based Discrimination and Untouchability
(Offence and Punishment) Act in 2011, the Committee remains concerned at the
lack of its effective implementation and the persistence of de facto discrimination against the
Dalit community. It also regrets the lack of sufficient resources provided to
the National Dalit Commission and the failure to effectively implement its
recommendations (arts. 2 and 26).
The
State party should strengthen its measures to implement the Caste-based
Discrimination and Untouchability (Offence and Punishment) Act and to eliminate
all forms of discrimination against the Dalit community. It should also ensure
that the National Dalit Commission can carry out its mandate effectively with
sufficient resources, and that its recommendations are effectively implemented.
Extrajudicial
killings, torture and ill-treatment
10. The
Committee is concerned at reports of unlawful killings in the Terai region,
deaths in custody, and the official confirmation of the widespread use of
torture and ill-treatment in places of police custody. It is deeply concerned
at the failure of the State party to adopt legislation defining and
criminalizing torture, and at the lack of concrete and comprehensive
information on investigations, prosecutions, convictions, sanctions imposed on
those responsible, and the impunity of law enforcement officials involved in
such human rights violations (arts. 2, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 14).
The
State party should take practical steps to prevent the excessive use of force
by law enforcement officials by ensuring that they comply with the Code of
Conduct of Law Enforcement Officials (General Assembly resolution 34/169) and
the Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement
Officials (1990). It should take appropriate measures to eradicate torture and
ill-treatment, including by adopting legislation defining and prohibiting
torture with sanctions and remedies commensurate with the gravity of the crime,
in accordance with international standards. It should also ensure that law
enforcement personnel receive training on the prevention and investigation of
torture and ill-treatment by integrating the Manual on the Effective
Investigation and Documentation of Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Istanbul Protocol). The State party should
ensure that allegations of unlawful killings, torture and ill-treatment are
effectively investigated, and that alleged perpetrators are persecuted and, if
convicted, punished with appropriate sanctions, and that the victims and their
families are provided with effective remedies.
Arbitrary
detention
11. While
noting that article 24 of the interim Constitution affords some legal
guarantees to persons deprived of their liberty, such as the right to be
informed of the grounds of their arrest and access to a court within 24 hours,
the Committee expresses concern at the failure to respect such rights in
practice. It also expresses concern at the lack of effective guarantees, in law
and in practice, of the rights of detainees to notify their immediate family
members about their detention and to have access to a doctor from the moment of
arrest, as well as the practice of maintaining false or inadequate custody
records and keeping detainees in unofficial places of detention (arts. 9, 10
and 14).
The
State party should take appropriate measures to ensure that no one under its
jurisdiction is subject to arbitrary arrest or detention and that detained persons
enjoy all legal guarantees, in compliance with articles 9 and 14 of the
Covenant. It should also publish all official places of detention on a regular
basis and explicitly forbid and criminalize the use of unofficial places for
detention.
Conditions
of detention
12. While
welcoming the introduction of the concept of open prisons and a community
prison system, the Committee expresses concern at overcrowding in prisons and
jails, unsanitary conditions of detention, and inadequate provision of basic services
and facilities, including medical care and adequate facilities for confidential
meetings with lawyers (arts. 9 and 10).
The
State party should take urgent measures to establish a system of regular and
independent monitoring of places of detention and to reduce overcrowding and
improve conditions of detention, in line with the Standard Minimum Rules for
the Treatment of Prisoners. In this regard, the State party should consider not
only the construction of new prison facilities but also the application of
alternative measures to pretrial detention, such as bail and home arrest, and
non-custodial sentences, such as suspended sentences, parole and community
service. The State party should also establish a confidential mechanism for
receiving and processing complaints lodged by detainees.
Violence
against women
13. While
noting the adoption of various laws and policies aimed at eliminating violence
against women, the Committee expresses concern at their weak implementation,
lack of a comprehensive system to collect data on cases of different types of
violence against women, and continuing reports of widespread sexual and
domestic violence against women and girls. It is also concerned at the narrow
definition of rape, the lack of progress in abolishing the 35-day limitation
period for filing complaints of rape, and disproportionately low penalties for
marital rape. The Committee further regrets the ongoing failure by the police
to register complaints, investigate and prosecute rape cases, and the trend of
such cases being diverted to settlement through informal justice mechanisms
(arts. 2, 3 and 7).
The
State party should ensure that all forms and manifestations of violence against
women are defined and prohibited under domestic law with sanctions commensurate
with the gravity of the offence, in accordance with international standards. It
should establish a comprehensive national data collection system on cases of
different types of violence against women to enable the State party to adopt
targeted strategies and evaluate their effectiveness. It should also conduct
awareness-raising campaigns on the negative effects of violence against women,
inform women of their rights and existing mechanisms of protection, and
facilitate complaints from victims. The State party should further ensure that
cases of violence against women are thoroughly investigated, perpetrators are
prosecuted and, if convicted, punished with appropriate sanctions, and that
victims have access to effective remedies and means of protection.
Refugees
14. While
commending the State party for hosting a large number of refugees and
asylum-seekers in its territory, the Committee is concerned that identity
documents have not been provided to Tibetan refugees since 1995, which places
the majority of the Tibetan refugee population at risk of financial penalties
under the 1994 Immigration Rules for irregular entry or presence in the State
party, detention, deportation and refoulement. It also expresses concern at the
restrictions imposed on Tibetan refugees’ rights should the State party deem
any activity to undermine the friendly relationship with its neighbour. The
Committee is also concerned about the lack of legislation that would ensure
adequate protection against refoulement (arts. 2, 7, 9, 13, 19, 26 and 27).
The
State party should adopt national refugee legislation in accordance with
international standards, strictly uphold the principle of non-refoulement, and
exempt refugees and asylum-seekers from penalties under the 1994 Immigration
Rules. It should undertake a comprehensive registration exercise of
long-staying Tibetans to ensure that all persons have proper documentation and
ensure, in law and in practice, that all refugees and asylum-seekers are not
subjected to arbitrary restrictions of their rights under the Covenant,
including freedom of expression, assembly and association. It should also
guarantee access to its territory to all Tibetans who may have a valid refugee
claim and refer them to UNHCR.
Corporal
punishment
15. While
noting the adoption of the National Children Policy in 2012, the Committee notes
that corporal punishment remains a concern, especially in the home, where it
traditionally continues to be practiced as a form of discipline by parents and
guardians (arts. 7 and 24).
The State party should take
practical steps, including through legislative measures where
appropriate, to put an end to corporal punishment in all settings. It should
encourage non-violent forms of discipline as alternatives to corporal punishment,
and should conduct public information campaigns to raise awareness about its
harmful effects.
Fair
trial
16. The
Committee is concerned at the failure to respect the right to remain silent in
practice, lack of legal clarity concerning the inadmissibility of evidence
obtained as a result of coercion, and the inadequate provision of legal aid
services. It also reiterates its previous concern regarding the quasi-judicial
authority of Chief District Officers (CDOs), whose dual capacity as members of
the executive and judiciary in criminal cases contravenes article 14 of the
Covenant (art. 14).
The
State party should take effective measures to guarantee the right to a fair
trial, in accordance with article 14 of the Covenant and general comment No. 32
(2007) on the right to equality before courts and tribunals and to a fair
trial. In particular, the State party should effectively ensure the right to
remain silent in practice, amend the Evidence Act to clarify that no defendant
should be compelled to give evidence and ensure that evidence which is the
result of coercion is inadmissible, and ensure that right to legal aid under
domestic law is guaranteed in practice. It should also limit the judicial
authority of CDOs to cases of minor gravity and amend the laws granting CDOs
judicial authority in line with the requirements under article 14 of the
Covenant.
Juvenile
justice
17. The
Committee expresses concern at the low age of criminal responsibility set at
ten years, and the systematic failure to accord children the right to a fair
trial with effective procedural guarantees appropriate to their ages. It also
regrets the failure to fully implement the 1992 Children’s Act which calls for
the establishment of an independent juvenile court (art. 14).
The
State party should raise the minimum age of criminal responsibility to
an acceptable level under international standards, and establish an independent
juvenile court to take into account their age and the desirability of promoting
their rehabilitation.
Trafficking
and bonded labour
18. The
Committee expresses concern at the lack of effective implementation of the
Human Trafficking and Transportation (Control) Act of 2007, and the persistence
of trafficking for purposes of sexual exploitation, forced labour, bonded
labour, domestic servitude and marriage, as well as trafficking in human
organs. It is also concerned at the alleged involvement of State officials in trafficking-related
crimes. The Committee is further concerned that child labour and traditional practices
of bonded labour such as Haliya, Kamaiya and Kamlari are still prevalent in
some regions of the State party (arts. 8 and 24).
The
State party should strengthen its efforts to prevent, suppress and punish
trafficking in persons, trafficking in human organs and bonded labour,
including the establishment of a system of data collection and analysis to
identify trends and implement effective strategies, and adoption of measures
aimed at empowering vulnerable groups to eliminate their risk of exploitation.
It should also ensure the effective implementation of the Human Trafficking and
Transportation (Control) Act of 2007, prosecute and sanction perpetrators,
including State officials complicit in trafficking-related crimes, and provide
victims with adequate protection and assistance.
Freedom
of expression
19. The
Committee expresses concern at vague and overbroad restrictions to the right to
freedom of expression under article 12 of the Interim Constitution, and at
reports that journalists and human rights defenders are subjected to physical
attacks, death threats, harassment and reprisals by security forces, police,
armed groups and youth wings of political parties (art.19).
The
State party should guarantee, in law and in practice, the right to freedom of
expression to all individuals, including non-citizens, and ensure that any
restriction to the right is in compliance with the restrictions as set out in
article 19, paragraph 3 of the Covenant and the Committee’s general comment
No.34 (2011) on freedoms of opinion and expression. It should also investigate
all cases of threats and attacks against journalists and human rights
defenders, hold the perpetrators accountable, and provide effective remedies to
victims.
Birth
registration and nationality
20. The
Committee, while appreciating efforts made thus far, expresses concern at the
low number of birth registrations, particularly in rural areas, and at
difficulties faced by women in the registration process. It also regrets that
the current legislation does not provide for the granting of nationality to
children born in the territory who would otherwise be stateless. Moreover,
while welcoming the launch of national distribution campaigns, the Committee is
concerned that more than four million persons still lack citizenship
certificates, which is essential for the enjoyment of rights guaranteed in the
Covenant, including the right to vote. It is also concerned that women are
denied equal rights as men with respect to acquiring and conferring nationality
(arts. 3, 16, 24, 25 and 26).
The
State party should amend the Birth, Death and Other Personal Incidents
Registration Act to ensure the birth registration of all children born on its
territory, and establish an efficient birth registration system that is free of
charge at all stages. It should also continue to strengthen efforts to remove
barriers, particularly for women and those living in rural areas, to access
citizenship certificates and birth registrations. The State party should ensure
that citizenship provisions of the new Constitution guarantee the equal right
of women to acquire, transfer and retain citizenship.
21. In
accordance with rule 71, paragraph 5, of the Committee’s rules of procedure,
the State party should provide, within one year, relevant information on its implementation of the Committee’s recommendations
made in paragraphs 5, 7 and 10 above.
22. The Committee requests
the State party, in its next periodic report, due to be submitted on 28 March 2018,
to provide, specific, up-to-date information on all its recommendations and on
the Covenant as a whole.
Thursday, March 27, 2014
Discrimination with Madhesi Dalit
I am a conscious Nepali citizen and am working as a social worker. I have been raising voice in favour of democratic values, customs and principles of inclusiveness, racial harmony, multilingualism and protection of identies.
The opponents deprived me of the opportunity to serve on the SMC because I am a madhesi and belong to the Dalit community and thus violated the law. The opponents action violated my citizens right enshrined in section 3 and 4 of Civil Rights Act, 1955 and therefore I have come to seek remedies from this court as per section 8(2) of judicial Administration Act, 1991. The election for the chairman of school management committee(SMC) of Mahalaxmi Primary School, Kapasi Karma, was held on December 29,2013. I got 58 votes but the opponents did not validate the last ballot paper though the larger part of the stamp was in my column. The opponents invalidated the last ballot paper and declared that top two contestents had a tie. The opponents then tosed a coin when went in my favour.
I won the election and even the documents were prepared to this effect, This process was again bypassed and it was decided that the winner will be selected through lottary system. The opponents conspired against me and wrote to paper pieces both of which had the word 'defeated'. The other opponent did not open his paper and threw it away, Thus all the opponents who are of pahadi (hill origin)conspired against me who was the only candidate from madhesi origin. The opponents violated rule 23 of education regulation and other existing education measure. The opponents did not give me any opportunity to present my points of arguments. The moment I won 58 votes and my opponent-2 won 57 votes , opponent-2 said that opponent-4 should be declared winner and I should be declared loser and this reflected his hatred towards me, who is a member of madhesi Dalit community. This selection committee, officer, staff of opponent no-3, police all is from the pahadi community and the candidate opponent no-4 is also from the same community. Thus the opponents have violated section 3 (1)(2) of the untouchability crime elimination and punishment Act, 2011 which prohibits discriminations against anybody on the basis of caste, ethnicity, and profession. Of the 123 guardians, 84 have filed a complaint at the DEO demanding reelection, but the education body paid no heed to their demand. Thus the decision by the opponent-1,2 and 3 to declare opponent-4 the winner is illegal and should therefore be quashed.
Sabitri Chamar who was my representative was not allowed to enter the election venue. Thus the opponents violated my right to be elected to a public post and guaranteed by section 3 and 4 of the civil rights Act. I hereby, seek nullification of the election held for school management committee and issuance of new appropriate order in the name of the opponents to hold fresh election for the same.
Applicant
Murali Chamar
The opponents deprived me of the opportunity to serve on the SMC because I am a madhesi and belong to the Dalit community and thus violated the law. The opponents action violated my citizens right enshrined in section 3 and 4 of Civil Rights Act, 1955 and therefore I have come to seek remedies from this court as per section 8(2) of judicial Administration Act, 1991. The election for the chairman of school management committee(SMC) of Mahalaxmi Primary School, Kapasi Karma, was held on December 29,2013. I got 58 votes but the opponents did not validate the last ballot paper though the larger part of the stamp was in my column. The opponents invalidated the last ballot paper and declared that top two contestents had a tie. The opponents then tosed a coin when went in my favour.
I won the election and even the documents were prepared to this effect, This process was again bypassed and it was decided that the winner will be selected through lottary system. The opponents conspired against me and wrote to paper pieces both of which had the word 'defeated'. The other opponent did not open his paper and threw it away, Thus all the opponents who are of pahadi (hill origin)conspired against me who was the only candidate from madhesi origin. The opponents violated rule 23 of education regulation and other existing education measure. The opponents did not give me any opportunity to present my points of arguments. The moment I won 58 votes and my opponent-2 won 57 votes , opponent-2 said that opponent-4 should be declared winner and I should be declared loser and this reflected his hatred towards me, who is a member of madhesi Dalit community. This selection committee, officer, staff of opponent no-3, police all is from the pahadi community and the candidate opponent no-4 is also from the same community. Thus the opponents have violated section 3 (1)(2) of the untouchability crime elimination and punishment Act, 2011 which prohibits discriminations against anybody on the basis of caste, ethnicity, and profession. Of the 123 guardians, 84 have filed a complaint at the DEO demanding reelection, but the education body paid no heed to their demand. Thus the decision by the opponent-1,2 and 3 to declare opponent-4 the winner is illegal and should therefore be quashed.
Sabitri Chamar who was my representative was not allowed to enter the election venue. Thus the opponents violated my right to be elected to a public post and guaranteed by section 3 and 4 of the civil rights Act. I hereby, seek nullification of the election held for school management committee and issuance of new appropriate order in the name of the opponents to hold fresh election for the same.
Applicant
Murali Chamar
जनता राज्यद्वारा प्रयोजित हिंसाको ऐतिहासिकरुपमा शिकार
तराईमा प्रहरीहरूद्वारा हुने हिंसाले गर्दा विधिको शासन लागू गर्ने मूल दायित्व बोकेका संस्थाहरूमा अत्यन्त नराम्रो प्रभाव परेको छ र तिनको विश्वसनीयता खासगरी प्रहरीको विश्वसनीयतालाई धुमिल बनाएको छ । यसको प्रभाव तराईमा एकदमै नराम्रो परेको छ किनभने त्यहाँका जनता राज्यद्वारा प्रयोजित हिंसाको ऐतिहासिकरुपमा शिकार हुँदैआएका छन् ।
यो प्रतिवेदनले तराईमा भइरहेको मानव अधिकारको निरन्तर उल्लंघनको घटनाको दस्तावेजीकरण गरेर ओएचसीएचआरको वहिर्गमनपछि मानव अधिकारको क्षेत्रमा सिर्जना भएको रिक्ततालाई पूरा गर्ने लक्ष्य राखेको छ र त्यसकारण तराई क्षेत्रमा विधिको शासन प्रत्याभूत गर्न, त्यहाँ भएका गम्भीर मानव अधिकारका उल्लंघनका घटनामा जिम्मेवारीपन एवं जवाफदेहिता कायम गर्न, प्रत्याभूति गर्न सरकारलाई विश्वव्यापी आवद्यिक समीक्षा प्रक्रियाअन्तर्गत नेपाली जनता एवं अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय समुदायसमक्ष गरेको प्रतिबद्धता पूरा गर्न अनुरोध गर्दछ ।
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
गैर न्यायिक हत्याका घटनाहरूको प्रभावकारी छानबिन गर्नका लागि कार्यविधिहरू अपर्याप्त
गैर न्यायिक हत्याका घटनाहरूको प्रभावकारी छानबिन गर्नका लागि कार्यविधिहरू अपर्याप्त रहेका छन् । यी त्रुटिहरूले नेपाली कानुनी
प्रणालीको कमीकमजोरीहरूलाई अझ उजागर गर्दछ । कुनै पनि अपराधको अनुसन्धानको
पहिलो अवरोध भनेको जाहेरी दरखास्तको दर्ता गराउने कुरा हो । अपराध हुँदा
प्रायः जसो जाहेरी दरखास्त दर्ता गर्न प्रहरीले अस्वीकार गर्ने गरेको
पाइएको छ । ओएचसीएचआरले जाहेरी दरखास्त दर्ता गर्न अस्वीकार गर्ने प्रवृति
व्यापक रहेको छ र प्रहरीले आफ्नो गैरकानुनी कार्यको जाँच पडताल टार्ने
उद्देश्यले यो अनौपचारिक नीति अबलम्बन गरेको हो भन्ने भान पर्दछ भन्ने कुरा
उल्लेख गरेको थियो ।ज्ञद्द अपराध घटना भएपछि जाहेरी दरखास्त सबैभन्दा
नजिकको प्रहरी कार्यालयमा दर्ता गर्नुपर्दछ ।ज्ञघ यसको मतलव प्रहरीले हत्या
ग¥यो भने उनीहरूविरुद्धको जाहेरी दरखास्त पनि उनीहरूबाटै वा उनीहरूको
सहयोगीबाट दर्ता गराउनुपर्दछ जसले गर्दा निष्पक्ष छानबिन हुने सम्भावना
रहँदैन । र अन्त्यमा महान्यायाधीवक्तालाई प्रहरीहरूद्वारा हुने छानबिनको
सुपरिवेक्षण गर्ने अधिकार भए पनि यो कुरा प्रहरीले प्रारम्भिक प्रतिवेदन
दायर गरिसकेपछिमात्रै लागू हुन्छ । त्यसकारण प्रहरीहरूले
प्रहरीहरूद्वारा भएको हत्याको मुद्दालाई भवितब्य ज्यानमा मुद्दा चलाउने वा अनुसन्धानलाई वर्षौसम्म लम्ब्याउने काम गर्दछन् ।
(जिम्मेबार बनाउनका लागि दण्डहिनता अन्तय गर्न कानुनमा गर्नुपर्ने सुधार (ह्ेल्ड टु एकाउन्ट, मेकिङ द ल वर्क टु फाइट इम्प्युनिटी इन नेपाल), डिसेम्बर २०११, एडभोकेसी फोरम तथा रिड्रेस, पृष्ठ ७)
(जिम्मेबार बनाउनका लागि दण्डहिनता अन्तय गर्न कानुनमा गर्नुपर्ने सुधार (ह्ेल्ड टु एकाउन्ट, मेकिङ द ल वर्क टु फाइट इम्प्युनिटी इन नेपाल), डिसेम्बर २०११, एडभोकेसी फोरम तथा रिड्रेस, पृष्ठ ७)
Tuesday, March 25, 2014
About EJK Report
गैरन्यायिक, विनापुर्पक्ष र स्वेच्छाचारी हत्यासम्बन्धी संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघीय ¥यापोर्टरले गैरन्यायिक हत्यालाई त्यस्तो हत्याको रुपमा पारिभाषित गर्दछ, जसले अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय मानव अधिकार अथवा मानवीय कानुनको उल्लंघन गर्दछ र जसमा प्रहरीद्वारा गरिने गैरकानुनी हत्या, सैनिक तथा नागरिक हिरासतमा हुने मृत्यु र व्यक्तिद्वारा गरिने हत्या जसमा सरकारी अधिकारीहरूले पर्याप्तरुपमा अनुसन्धान गर्दैन, त्यस्ता घटनालाई बुझाउँदछ ।”ठ यो प्रतिवेदनमा हामीले प्रहरी हिरासतमा भएको मृत्यु,र सुरक्षासम्बन्धी कारवाहीमा भएका त्यस्ता मृत्युहरूलाई समावेश गरेका छौं, जसमा मृतकले सुरक्षा अधिकारीको हात खुट्टा तथा ज्यानमाथि खतरा सिर्जना गरेका थिएनन् र उनीहरूलाई नियन्त्रणमा लिन सकिने अवस्था थियो तर सुरक्षा कारवाही गर्दा ती व्यक्तिको मृत्यु भएको थियो । गैर न्यायिक हत्याले मान्छेको बाँच्न पाउने अधिकारको उल्लंघन गर्दछ, जुन अधिकार मानव अधिकारसम्बन्धी विश्वव्यापी घोषणापत्रको धारा ३ र नागरिक तथा राजनीतिक अधिकारसम्बन्धी अनुबन्धको धारा ६ ले प्रत्याभूत गरेको छ । धारा ६ ले यो अधिकार कानुनद्वारा संरक्षित हुनेछ र “कसैलाई पनि बाँच्न पाउने अधिकारबाट स्वेच्छाचारी तरिकाले बन्चित गरिने छैन” भन्ने उल्लेख गरेको छ ।
Monday, March 24, 2014
Our Research book launch on March 29, 2014
Research book of Continuing Extrajudicial Execution in the Terai is going to launch on March 29, 2014, researched and published by THRD Alliance.
Statement Of Hemant Chaudhary about his arrest:
Personal details of victim:
Victim's Name: Hemant Chaudhary
Age: 24 Years
Address: Baijapur VDC-6, Banke
Profession: Journalism
Education: Intermediate
Contact NO. : 9848134542
Gurdian: Susil Sharma(publisher of
Korsh Dainik)
Gurdian's NO. : 9848275217
Report Of the Incident
Date and Time: August 6,2013 at
10:15pm
Location: Nepalgunja Muncipality 1,
Banke near Puspalal Chowk.
Added Time: Released without keeping
in the custody.
Meeting with the family:
Blame: Beating without any reason.
Statement Of Hemant Chaudhary about
his arrest:
It was Tuesday's night. As usual,
after completing the work of the Naya Korsh Dainik, Chaudhary was going with
plates(pre-used material for printing) to the Tripura offset. A police on duty
mistreated him when he was going on foot. A soldier of Armed Police Force
named Gandhiraj Gurung, slapped chaudhary on his right cheek closed to
the ear for not walking on the sidewalk. Gurung beat him with his boot
injuring his right leg. After this police team of Nepalgunja deployed under Ram
Bahadur KC took him to the Nepalgun Medical College. Chaudhary said the police
intimidated him for not waking on the sidewalk of the road. Chaudhari said
police verbally abused him when he told the police not to intimidate him or
speak aggressively. both the police personnel were intoxicated, said
Chaudhary.
Statement Of Victims regarding
consequences of Torture inflicted on him(Chaudhary):
Due to police's torture,
Chaudhary has difficulty in sitting and standing up and his
right ear and leg have also swelled.
Reason for Torture: Didn't
walk from the side of the road.
Alleged perpetrator: Gandhiraj
Gurung
Gandhiraj Gurung who has been
working in the Nepalgunja police cell for six years and another bulky
police personnel whose identity could not be ascertained.
Reporter
Reporting Date: April,8,2013
Alam Khan, Human Rights Officer
THRD Alliance, Mid-Western Office, Banke.
Sunday, March 23, 2014
Ajay Marik, Rita Devi Marik and
Binod Basfor, resident of Dharan Municipality, Sunsari were subjected to caste
discrimination.
Case: Caste discrimination
Date and time of incident: January,
04, 2014
Location: Chhata Chowk, Dharan
Alleged perpetrator: Nanda Lal
Sah, Director, Parvati Sweats Corner
Source of Information: Blast
Daily newspaper
Background: Proprietor
of Parvati Sweats Corner Nanda Lal Sah is accused of discriminating Ajay,
Rita and Binod for being Dalits. Ajay who is a staff at the
Dharan Municipality, said the shop owner discriminated him in front of his
guest when he went to have tea at the shop. The three victims said
the shopkeeper called them Dom and mistreated them. He said when he went to the
shop at 8
am on Saturday, the shop owner denied to serve
them tea and pushed them away from the shop. Not only that, the shop owner
poured hot tea on his wife Rita Devi Marik.
But, She’s son said he
didn't serve them tea because his mother falls sick. According to Binod
Basfor who works at B.P Korala Institute of Health Science Nanda Lal also
discriminated them. The victims have filed a complaint at the Area Police
Office against this act of caste discrimination seeking compensation from
the perpetrator. A police team deployed under
Inspector Mukund Rijal of Area Police Office arrested Sah. Police
Inspector Rijal said action will be taken against the perpetrator in accordance
with anti-cast discrimination law.
Rajkishor son of Nanda Lal
said, his mother falls sick when she comes in contact with Doms and that was
the only reason they told them to go to a different tea shop. Rajkishor,
however, denied mistreating the three victims. He said the three people were
told to go out after they started touching the sweets at the shop. “I have served them tea many times
when my mother was not in the shop. I only told them not to come to our
shop when my mother is around,” he added. Rajkishor said, these people
came to his shop with the intention to pick a fight. His mother told them that
they were not discriminated on grounds of caste.
Dalit activists said when his mother
Parvati came to the Area police Office, she looked sick but she could be
faking her illness. Role of Institution: This case is
being investigated by National Human Rights Commission. Area police Office has
kept the alleged perpetrator in the custody and investigating the case as per
anti-cast discrimination act.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)